Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-9154802-20170507232120/@comment-25974963-20170508134120

I'll try too look at this as objectively as possible before I give my opinion: What we know, Kuzon an admin edit the chat logs despite this being against the rule. This can be confirmed by the edit history of said logs so it is objectively true, and whatever the reason may be for it is a simple fact that a rule was broken. Should an admin who is supposed to use his powers enforce the rules do this, the answers to this is no. When someone breaks the rules they are supposed to be punished for it, admin or not. Personally I believe the punishment should fit the crime regardless of who the person is, so if the punishment for said rulebreaking is a demotion and a 3 day ban. Then that should be it, no reason to go make examples out of people and be extra harsh, which would indeed make it look like a coup d'etat.