User blog comment:Geti186/Reasons for my Ban/@comment-15906818-20131204050658/@comment-6326997-20131204161359

I know you didn't ask what I think. But I think the primary reason for the ban (even if it is a bit illegitimate) is because of the alleged arguments or rather, the frequency of the arguments that the administrators hold you accountable for.

This is supposed to be a role-play and no one likes it when someone always has something to say about: Why this shouldn't be here, who's right and who's wrong, or just likes being contentious in general. It discourages new Users from coming to the wiki, I'm new here and I can already say the only things I have seen so far between many of the comments made from Zion to you and vice-versa have been confrontational.

I know I don't see the whole picture, but that is just the perspective of some new Members like me. I personally don't like arguments but I don't necessarily want someone's right to argue to be restricted. I do think the rule is important because there are those who simply have enough arguments in their local life and don't want to log on and have to battle someone who possibly lives half-way-across-the-world.

Just my two-cent.