Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-28510571-20170510035714/@comment-28510571-20170511121428

I don't see why he doesn't have the right to argue. Even if punishment is an inevitable conclusion, it's still best to at least acknowledge his stance on why he did it. Kuz had been hoping to talk to you about things relating to the wiki, and he had seen that you were not responding to him whatsoever. When you happen to be busy and you are on the chat, it would have probably helped by leaving to ensure that he knew this, or you could have informed him again. It is true that he did this action for attention, however this doesn't mean that he is acting in the way of a toddler, who would do something like this for pure attention alone. Rather, Kuz did it to get your attention in order to discuss things. Speaking of honesty, it's a good thing to express, but there are also some situations where you need to leave your honest opinion to yourself, this being one of them (it never supported your post at all, so there was simply no need for it, like I've also said). When we aren't focusing on the present, Kuz's overall history are not deserving of a demotion either. He doesn't repetitively break rules, and he's actually been working hard with you to get the wiki in a better condition, so an event such as this deciding his permanent position sounds ridiculous (not to mention that he hasn't ever done anything that has been highly controversial or questionable). You look to be the only one who thinks of him as having an aggressive nature because his posts, even when having to deal with frustrating situations, are sometimes written in a manner to get the point across but never in a way that makes him sound angry (yet you have responded to us in all caps and exclamations multiple times). Before making assumptions, you should have thought about it to a greater extent than what you did.